I happened to listen to it again recently and several new things caught my
attention. First is that Russell didn’t like Earl Warren, didn’t want to serve
with him, and didn’t think the Chief Justice should in any event be appointed to
such a commission. And second, Johnson hints of something sinister about the
assassination and suggests that the investigation could lead to WWIII if
mishandled. This latter point surprised me more now than it did when I was
writing the book. Before explaining, let me show you excerpts from the phone
call. I think there are errors in the online transcript and have substituted
corrections and added explanatory material.
***
Russell: “I couldn’t serve on it
[the Warren Commission] with Chief Justice Warren… I don’t like that man….I
don’t have any confidence in him at all.
LBJ: [W]e’ve got to take this out of
the arena where they’re testifying that Khrushchev and Castro did this and did
that and get us into a war that can kill 40 million Americans in an hour and you
would put on your uniform in a minute [to prevent WWIII]… and you can do
anything for your country and don’t go giving me that kind of stuff about you
can’t serve with anybody… you’ll do anything.
Russell: It is not only that… I
just don’t think the Chief Justice should have served on it.
LBJ: Well the Chief
Justice ought to do anything he can to save America and right now… we’ve got a
very touchy thing and… wait until you look at this evidence.. you, wait until
you look at this report.
Russell then says Johnson should have told him that he was
going to put Warren on the Commission. LBJ counters by saying he had told
Russell in the earlier call that he was going to do this. Russell responds,
remembering correctly that in the earlier call, which was also recorded, Johnson said he planned to get someone from the Court, but he did not say it would be
Warren. When Russell asks Johnson not to name him to the Commission, Johnson tells him
that it has already been announced. Russell argues that he doesn’t have time and
offers apparent health objections, saying “my future is behind me.”
LBJ: [A]ll
you’ll do [on the Commission] is evaluate the Hoover report he has already made.
LBJ: [Y]ou’re going to lend your name to this thing because you’re head of the
CIA Committee…. Secretary of State came over here this afternoon. He’s deeply
concerned Dick [Russell] about the idea that they’re spreading throughout the
communist world that Khrushchev killed Kennedy. [This doesn’t make sense. Why
would the Soviets want to claim they killed Kennedy].. now he didn’t. He didn’t
have a damned thing to do with it.
Russell: Well, I don’t think he did directly.
I know Khrushchev didn’t because he thought he’d get along better under Kennedy.
LBJ: All right, but we’ve….
Russell: I wouldn’t be surprised if Castro had.
Johnson continues to encourage Russell to get along with Warren. “You can give him some
confidence” and “I’m not afraid to put your intelligence against Warren’s.”
Later, after discussing other, unrelated topics, Johnson brags about how he
persuaded Warren to lead the commission.
LBJ: Well you want me to tell you the
truth? You know what happened? Bobby [Attorney General Robert Kennedy] and them
went up to see him today and he turned them down cold and said NO. Two hours
later I called him and ordered him down here and he didn’t want to come. I
insisted he come.. came down here and told me No twice and I just pulled out
what Hoover told me about a little incident in Mexico City and I say now, I
don’t want Mr. Khrushchev to be told tomorrow and be testifying before a camera
that he killed this fellow.. and that Castro killed him and all I want you do to
is look at the facts and bring in any other facts you want in here and determine
who killed the President.
The conversation ends a few sentences later.
***
Several of the things Lyndon Johnson says in this conversation seem out of place
when put in the chronology of what was known at the time. They raise questions
about whether Johnson really understood the facts or whether he was exaggerating
in order to persuade the reluctant Russell.
On November 24, five days before
this phone call, Hoover had told LBJ’s aide Walter Jenkins that public
disclosure of the possibility of foreign involvement should be avoided. Deputy
Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach gave the same advice to Bill Moyers,
another LBJ aide, on November 26. And contrary to what LBJ says in this call,
Katzenbach said that the right-wing in the United States, not the communist
world, was claiming the communists were behind the assassination.
It isn't clear as to what Mexico City incident the president is referring to. The FBI and CIA
knew almost immediately after the assassination on November 22 that Lee Harvey
Oswald had visited the Soviet and Cuban consulates there, trying to get visas.
This is probably not what Johnson had in mind. More likely, he is talking about
the so-called Alvardo allegation. A man named Gilberto Alvardo had told Mexican
authorities that he had seen Oswald take money from a man at the Cuban
consulate. However, by November 28, CIA Director John McCone had sent a
memorandum to Johnson’s national security advisor McGeorge Bundy debunking
Alvardo’s allegations and planned to cover the matter again with Bundy the next
morning, November 29. In other words, by the time of this phone call, Johnson
should have known that the CIA at least had concluded Alvardo’s allegations were
specious. So again, either Johnson didn’t know the facts or he was exaggerating
in order to get Earl Warren and Richard Russell on the commission – or perhaps
both were true.
One thing is abundantly clear, though. Lyndon Johnson feared that an
investigation might uncover a foreign conspiracy and lead to nuclear war.
Finally,
the conversation raises a question that I've not seen answered: What if anything
had the CIA told Richard Russell about its investigation prior to this
conversation. He was chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, which was
at the time the only Senate committee that oversaw CIA operations.
No comments:
Post a Comment